Transcript 24 January 2013 #lrnchat on research

by

08:30:44 pm lrnchat: Hello everyone and welcome to #lrnchat. We’re glad you’re here.
08:31:09 pm lodtrain: RT @JaneBozarth: yay! #lrnchat
08:31:26 pm Quinnovator: Time again for the 60 minute memestream that is #lrnchat, duck or, better yet, join in! Welcome to new and returning participants!
08:31:31 pm lrnchat: Please introduce yourself. Name, specialties, interests, etc.? #lrnchat
08:31:37 pm lodtrain: #lrnchat Glad to be back, looking forward to learning tonite.
08:32:22 pm Quinnovator: Clark Quinn, learning experience design instigator, consultant/author/speaker, genial malcontent, Walnut Creek CA #lrnchat
08:32:26 pm billcush: Just might be able to join tonight. RT @lrnchat: Hello everyone and welcome to #lrnchat. We’re glad you’re here.
08:32:38 pm JD_Dillon: Howdy, all! JD from Orlando … learning strategist, information architect, jungle skipper, frustrated #Flyers fan #lrnchat
08:32:48 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat Autumn T, LMS admin, etraining addict, SoMe Junkie, mobile learning sponge #lrnchat
08:33:24 pm lrnchat: Q0. We always begin with this: What did you learn today? If not today, then this week? #lrnchat
08:33:54 pm lodtrain: #lrnchat IT global education – “clickity click” training
08:34:00 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q0. We always begin with this: What did you learn today? If not today, then this week? #lrnchat
08:34:07 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q0. We always begin with this: What did you learn today? If not today, then this week? #lrnchat
08:34:10 pm eLearninCyclops: Q0) Jeff – eLearning Designer, classroom trainer today, in Baltimore, MD. Oh, we finally got snow here #lrnchat
08:34:19 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat life won’t wait… Live every moment to its fullest. #lrnchat
08:34:35 pm JD_Dillon: A0) Learning plenty about the professional version of @zebrazapps this week, amazing support from the ZZ team! #lrnchat
08:34:36 pm Quinnovator: a0) that I kinda miss commingling ThursNiteFooty and #lrnchat :)
08:34:43 pm lodtrain: #lrnchat Q0) Learned about 40 universities offering free learning http://t.co/xueViXh1
08:34:55 pm mpetersell: Hi all, Mike from Connecticut here. I’ve been away for a while so I’m happy to be back here at #lrnchat
08:34:56 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat Q0: patience is a virtue. #lrnchat
08:34:57 pm Quinnovator: a0) that a good posole is a wonderful thing #lrnchat
08:35:08 pm billcush: Bill Cushard…Trainer, author, runner. #lrnchat
08:35:16 pm billcush: RT @lrnchat: Q0. We always begin with this: What did you learn today? If not today, then this week? #lrnchat
08:35:29 pm urbie: #lrnchat Qintro urbie delgado, instructional designer, Artesia NM, rehumanizing elearning one pixel at a time
08:35:30 pm lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:35:36 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:36:00 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:36:02 pm eLearninCyclops: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:36:09 pm billcush: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:36:15 pm Quinnovator: a1) research is for everyone! Should inform your practice, your work, and your continual self-improvement #lrnchat
08:36:23 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:36:32 pm reubentozman: A1) what re you classifying as research #lrnchat
08:36:47 pm JaneBozarth: Q0 Learned about 3D music http://t.co/iwS04pKC #lrnchat
08:36:47 pm urbie: #lrnchat Q0 what’d learn last night? being myself is cool. probably no one worries about it as much as me so loosen up dude..
08:36:59 pm billcush: Q1) Research is for the academe….unless it is written in “English.” Then it is for end users. #lrnchat
08:37:03 pm JD_Dillon: A1) Research (of all kinds) should provide the means to improve and refine the end user experience #lrnchat
08:37:05 pm mpetersell: Q1 – Research provides information for decision-making. Whoever needs it will use it. #lrnchat
08:37:09 pm Quinnovator: a1) different kinds of research: there’s statistical significance, business significance, and personal significance #lrnchat
08:37:12 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q1: the end user: be a sponge always.
08:37:23 pm andrearist: Oh yea I get to catch a #lrnchat!
08:37:25 pm JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #lrnchat
08:37:44 pm Quinnovator: RT @JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #lrnchat < !
08:37:44 pm reubentozman: A1) also what parts of research are you exposing? #lrnchat
08:37:50 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat It’s time for #lrnchat! Julie Dirksen http://t.co/jxKUwq5U – usually in MN, but currently in the bay area. Big learning nerd.
08:37:56 pm lodtrain: Q1) Research should be a daily do and or read (focus groups, learning on Twitter…) #lrnchat
08:38:01 pm eLearninCyclops: RT @JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #lrnchat
08:38:06 pm JaneBozarth: @billcush Yes ‘academic’ talk is like a 2nd language. I know people who charge $$ to ‘academic up’ dissertations,etc #lrnchat
08:38:22 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q1: academic – data collection & application. End user – implementation
08:38:24 pm Quinnovator: RT @usablelearning: @lrnchat It’s time for #lrnchat! Julie Dirksen http://t.co/bgZ1sTST Big learning nerd. > and great lunch company!
08:38:31 pm JaneBozarth: Great research teaches something but directs you to more great research, too #lrnchat
08:38:35 pm JD_Dillon: RT @JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #lrnchat
08:38:39 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:38:45 pm ThomasStone: RT @mpetersell: Q1 – Research provides information for decision-making. Whoever needs it will use it. #lrnchat
08:38:51 pm billcush: @janebozarth Right….research is so infrequently accessible to regular people. #lrnchat
08:38:54 pm james_carla: RT @lrnchat: Q1) Who is research for? (the academic community or end users) What makes you feel that way? #lrnchat
08:39:02 pm urbie: #lrnchat A1 research is for everyone. that’s the good news. The rest of the story is you gotta be looking for it all the time..
08:39:08 pm jackiegerstein: Focus in education should be action research and youth participatory action research http://t.co/jlLJEaVU #lrnchat
08:39:10 pm BenjaminHarwood: @Quinnovator Agreed. Research funded by public funds especially.. Ensuring it gets published where all can access it freely is key.#lrnchat
08:39:11 pm lodtrain: “@JaneBozarth: Great research teaches something but directs you to more great research, too #lrnchat” it’s a continuous process
08:39:20 pm JaneBozarth: Also acad journals can be inaccessible — behind univ library wall, or charge for view/download. #lrnchat
08:39:25 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat – q1) I want research to be for everybody, but think the format isn’t nearly as accessible as it should be. #lrnchat
08:39:33 pm JaneBozarth: I teach a grad course partly to get access to library #lrnchat
08:39:39 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth but what parts of the research….just the ‘results’ or methods and MU and…know what I mean #lrnchat
08:39:43 pm mpetersell: RT @JaneBozarth: …research SHOULD be for the public, but often.. only accessible academics > everyone loves a good “p value” eh? #lrnchat
08:40:06 pm audioswhite: RT @JaneBozarth: Great research teaches something but directs you to more great research, too #lrnchat
08:40:07 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth how would john public know whether research was good or bad. #lrnchat
08:40:08 pm LnDDave: Greetings #lrnchat. David from New York, checking in! #Lrnchat
08:40:12 pm urbie: #lrnchat A1 i’m interested in study skills research, BKMs especially those that i can apply in the classroom, blended and online
08:40:27 pm Quinnovator: a1) barriers to research accessibility: language, narrow applicability, journal acceptance #lrnchat
08:40:39 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman I don’t know what you mean, but I mean all of it. I esp love a good lit review. #lrnchat
08:40:44 pm lodtrain: RT @Quinnovator: a1) barriers to research accessibility: language, narrow applicability, journal acceptance #lrnchat
08:40:45 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #Lrnchat
08:40:48 pm jmass: I like to read the abstract and recommendations for further research :) #lrnchat
08:40:56 pm JaneBozarth: @LnDDave oh good you’re here #lrnchat
08:41:04 pm Quinnovator: a1) barriers to meaningful research: funding, vision, short term pressure #lrnchat
08:41:25 pm JD_Dillon: RT @jmass: I like to read the abstract and recommendations for further research :) #lrnchat
08:41:27 pm Quinnovator: RT @jmass: I like to read the abstract and recommendations for further research :) #lrnchat < good practice
08:41:32 pm reubentozman: Its up to community to distill relevance and significance for the public. #lrnchat
08:41:37 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman well that’s what we’re talking about #lrnchat
08:42:09 pm Quinnovator: RT @jmass: I like to read the abstract and recommendations for further research :) #lrnchat < also implications (if they’ve provided)
08:42:41 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman sounds kind of elitist? How is ‘community’ in this sense any better than ‘academy’? #lrnchat
08:42:46 pm urbie: #lrnchat A1 would you classify environmental scans, benchmarking as research? cool going to @astd_vos workshops in AZ when i can.. collab.
08:43:02 pm andrearist: A1) Perhaps done by academics but ultimately for solutions that will positively impact end users. Not research for research sake. #lrnchat
08:43:11 pm eLearning_softw: 20 Augmented Reality Experiments in #Education http://t.co/0mnoQuQ8 #lrnchat #elearning
08:43:14 pm lodtrain: Q1) I like visual research such as a great infographic #lrnchat
08:43:17 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: @reubentozman sounds kind of elitist? How is community in this sense any better than academy? #Lrnchat
08:43:18 pm JD_Dillon: Interpretation based on purpose. RT @reubentozman: Its up to community to distill relevance and significance for the public. #lrnchat
08:43:29 pm lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #lrnchat
08:43:34 pm urbie: @JaneBozarth #lrnchat i like having access to Capella’s and UNT’s online libraries as an alum..
08:43:40 pm mpetersell: I read just enough to get the sense of how the research was conducted; once I feel comfortable with it, I skip ahead to findings. #lrnchat
08:43:41 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat – q1) Also, getting access is frequently a nightmare http://t.co/nQ4qoLqW messed up economics #lrnchat
08:43:58 pm Quinnovator: @urbie I consider enviro scans, benchmarking as research if useful! (tho’ hate best practices: best principles/next practices!) #lrnchat
08:44:00 pm billcush: @JaneBozarth …while I ‘academic’ down my dissertation. #lrnchat
08:44:07 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #lrnchat
08:44:08 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #lrnchat
08:44:14 pm LnDDave: RT @lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #Lrnchat
08:44:23 pm CowryArts: RT @jackiegerstein: Focus in education should be action research and youth participatory action research http://t.co/jlLJEaVU #lrnchat
08:44:34 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #lrnchat
08:44:37 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth It is elitist. If you don’t understand what’s good and bad research then you need people that do #lrnchat
08:44:46 pm JaneBozarth: RT @usablelearning: @lrnchat – q1) Also, getting access is frequently a nightmare http://t.co/nQ4qoLqW messed up economics #lrnchat
08:44:58 pm mpetersell: Q2-ASTD, I4CP, ISPI, Bersin are my regular sources for nerdy workplace learning stuff #lrnchat
08:45:04 pm lodtrain: Q2) Research on learning methodologies, research on training tools, research on L&D #lrnchat
08:45:17 pm Quinnovator: a2) mostly journal/acad conf submissions (and most are surprisingly bad), get BJET since on board :) #lrnchat
08:45:19 pm urbie: @Quinnovator BKMs get a dialog started #lrnchat that’s what i like.. collaboration comes after. @jkunrein is cool for that..
08:45:21 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman so then back to who is research for if not for the public, esp if publicly funded? #lrnchat
08:45:37 pm JD_Dillon: A2) Rely on a carefully selected peer group and listen to constant chatter and sharing to find relevant info. #lrnchat
08:45:39 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman then why not make it more accessible in the first place, so it doesn’t need translating? #lrnchat
08:45:40 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat I like the mind and brain feed from science daily http://t.co/1tDuuqtf #lrnchat but beware crappy press releases #ymmv
08:45:41 pm jmass: Nerd deluge commence http://t.co/7Pd1TzQ8 #lrnchat
08:45:41 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q2) What sources of research do you track, and how do you follow updates? #lrnchat
08:45:47 pm mizminh: Research onprotein folding will likely be opaque to me without interpretation; on an approach to enhancing adult literacy – I’m in #lrnchat
08:46:10 pm lodtrain: Q2) Follow research updates by subscriptions, following blogs, following vendors, reading reading reading #lrnchat
08:46:12 pm mpetersell: Q2 – Masie Center too
#lrnchat
08:46:14 pm urbie: @Quinnovator #lrnchat sorry for the acronym.. the Intel in me is coming through.. Best Known Method..
08:46:15 pm LnDDave: Q2) I usually read research reports from ASTD and the eLearning Guild for industry information. #Lrnchat
08:46:16 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat multiple forms of competitive intelligence for research on the what’s happening in the field via twitter & FB
08:46:16 pm andrearist: RT @mpetersell: Q2-ASTD, I4CP, ISPI, Bersin are my regular sources for nerdy workplace learning stuff #lrnchat
08:46:18 pm Quinnovator: a2) what’s pointed to by my network! #lrnchat
08:46:21 pm jmass: http://t.co/yIdNJCWi #lrnchat
08:46:35 pm lodtrain: RT @LnDDave: Q2) I usually read research reports from ASTD and the eLearning Guild for industry information. #Lrnchat
08:46:49 pm billcush: Q2) having access to academic libraries helps. ABI-Inform covers enough. #lrnchat
08:46:54 pm jmass: http://t.co/UoISzDf0 #lrnchat
08:46:56 pm JD_Dillon: A2) PLN = research team :-) #lrnchat
08:47:00 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman why’s community viewed as more trustworthy than source? I’m part of community gives credence to learning styles #lrnchat
08:47:07 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth The impact of research is for the public. Research is written for academics #lrnchat
08:47:08 pm LnDDave: RT @Quinnovator: a2) whats pointed to by my network! #Lrnchat
08:47:11 pm usablelearning: Nice! RT ‏@jmass Nerd deluge commence http://t.co/u1lxd7VS … #lrnchat
08:47:22 pm BenjaminHarwood: @reubentozman @JaneBozarth Are members of the Wikipedia community doing the world a disservice with bad research? #lrnchat
08:47:26 pm xpconcept: @JaneBozarth @reubentozman – gets to motive for conducting research. Who is audience? If audience = field, messaging shld be tuned. #lrnchat
08:47:29 pm jmass: http://t.co/3G06B0Xt #lrnchat
08:47:47 pm mpetersell: Q2 – elearningguild – now that I’m a full member I can download those juicy whitepapers and reports. #lrnchat
08:47:54 pm JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood why do you think it’s bad? #lrnchat
08:48:01 pm jmass: http://t.co/4owzImMi #lrnchat
08:48:13 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman well ain’t that a shame. #lrnchat
08:48:21 pm LnDDave: @reubentozman wait, research is written for academics? By academics I get, but shouldn’t it be written for those that use it? #Lrnchat
08:48:33 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q2: getting daily updates via email from SME’s currently involved in the field
08:48:35 pm urbie: #lrnchat Q2 interesting part of this research hunting/gathering is how much dross (from my perspective) there is. it’s like panning for gold
08:48:36 pm Quinnovator: a2) eLearnMag, Guild, CLO #lrnchat
08:48:48 pm mizminh: Perhaps research is for practitioners and students of the given field #lrnchat
08:48:51 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat q2) and have to mention LS Research for Practitioners http://t.co/ec8mqnv5 #lrnchat #shamelessselfpromotion
08:49:08 pm britz: RT @JD_Dillon: A2) Rely on a carefully selected peer group and listen to constant chatter and sharing to find relevant info #lrnchat /Trust
08:49:10 pm LnDDave: RT @xpconcept: – gets to motive for conducting research. Who is audience? If audience = field, messaging shld be tuned. #Lrnchat
08:49:20 pm billcush: Cool. RT @mpetersell: Q2 – elearningguild – now that I’m a full member I can download those juicy whitepapers and reports. #lrnchat
08:49:48 pm Quinnovator: @LnDDave @reubentozman academics publish to each other, to advance field (and their careers).Up to others to interpret #lrnchat
08:49:49 pm audioswhite: A1) my take Research is for peer community/researcher, but should be easily accessible by the interested public #lrnchat
08:49:57 pm mpetersell: Q2 – forgot CLO; I like the network too
#lrnchat
08:49:58 pm Quinnovator: RT @usablelearning: @lrnchat q2) and have to mention LS Research for Practitioners http://t.co/ec8mqnv5 #lrnchat #shamelessselfpromotion
08:50:04 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat Sometimes academic/scholarly language is needed to describe the research. Then interpret for non-academic audience
08:50:06 pm lodtrain: Q2) Social communities great source of sharing research #lrnchat
08:50:10 pm urbie: #lrnchat A2 for the last 1/2 year i’ve been following comics, writers, artists.. it’s amazing how much of what they do spills over to L&D..
08:50:18 pm billcush: Q2) Bad research: if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck….it’s probably a duck. #lrnchat
08:50:19 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth Why? People study years to master research methodology. Not everyone can do it #lrnchat
08:50:34 pm LnDDave: RT @usablelearning: q2) and have to mention LS Research for Practitioners http://t.co/E3alvCJI #lrnchat #shamelessselfpromotion #Lrnchat
08:50:52 pm JaneBozarth: I like Europe Journal of Voc Training, HRD Quarterly, Advances in Dev. Human Resources, etc #lrnchat
08:50:54 pm ThomasStone: RT @LnDDave: Q2) I usually read research reports from ASTD and the eLearning Guild for industry information. #Lrnchat
08:50:59 pm Quinnovator: @reubentozman @JaneBozarth back to types of research, not all have to do for stat significance, biz significance can be sufficient #lrnchat
08:51:05 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman I don’t know why. #lrnchat
08:51:18 pm lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:51:19 pm urbie: #lrnchat A2 another good source (but hard to sift through) is stuff from Rand or other agencies.. bleeding edge stuff is there if i dig
08:51:44 pm JaneBozarth: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:51:58 pm Quinnovator: a2) I *like* learning sciences, Instructional science, but don’t always get (too bloody dear) #lrnchat
08:52:00 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:52:02 pm lodtrain: Q2) Gartner Predicts Over 70 Percent of Global 2000 Organisations Will Have at Least One Gamified Application by 2014 #lrnchat
08:52:05 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:52:09 pm LnDDave: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #Lrnchat
08:52:11 pm a_Tuffin: RT “@JaneBozarth: Q1 I feel research SHOULD be for the public, but often written so as to only be accessible to other academics #lrnchat”
08:52:12 pm xpconcept: #lrnchat – (1/2) I like to thumb through journals of other disciplines. Some great stuff even in old research.
08:52:35 pm Quinnovator: a3) practice practice practice #lrnchat
08:52:45 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:52:57 pm JaneBozarth: Q3 some seem to feel not role of smelly proletariat to learn to read it, but I disagree. #lrnchat
08:53:05 pm LnDDave: RT @xpconcept: #lrnchat – (1/2) I like to thumb through journals of other disciplines. Some great stuff even in old research. #Lrnchat
08:53:07 pm Quinnovator: a3) or don’t read journal pubs, read digests (e.g. Handbook of…) #lrnchat
08:53:08 pm xpconcept: #lrnchat (2/2) – style of research doc vary a bit by discipline. Interesting going from psych to edu to aesthetic to engineering.
08:53:12 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat Q3: by using SME’s to break down the content if it is inaccessible. #lrnchat
08:53:22 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q3) Research is often written in an academic style that can make it inaccessible. How do you learn to read research? #lrnchat
08:53:31 pm jmass: A3. I wait for Dan Pink to popularize it #lrnchat
08:53:35 pm lodtrain: Q3) Research is searchable, so choose your topic and read where the information meets your needs or join a group to discuss it #lrnchat
08:53:37 pm Quinnovator: RT @a_Tuffin: @lrnchat Q3: by using SME’s to break down the content if it is inaccessible. #lrnchat < great tip!
08:53:54 pm JD_Dillon: A3) Find reliable sources that can help distill the rough data into a format that matches your purpose. Help! #lrnchat
08:54:00 pm Quinnovator: RT @jmass: A3. I wait for Dan Pink to popularize it #lrnchat < :) @DanielPink
08:54:05 pm JD_Dillon: Boom! RT @jmass: A3. I wait for Dan Pink to popularize it #lrnchat
08:54:13 pm mpetersell: Q3 – learned to read it in Grad School; Prof Koppelman’s Research Methodology class @Baruch College – one of my academic highlights #lrnchat
08:54:27 pm LnDDave: A3) Why note write it to be read in the first place? #Lrnchat
08:54:31 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat a3) it IS frustrating, because some of the arch conventions of academic writing obscure meaning #showmeadamnexamplealready #lrnchat
08:54:38 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth I prefer ‘pedestrians’ #lrnchat
08:54:43 pm JaneBozarth: How teachers learn to understand research http://t.co/oB0j3cgv #lrnchat
08:54:49 pm Quinnovator: RT @mpetersell: Q3 – learned to read it in Grad School #lrnchat < well, yes, that’s the *standard* answer ;)
08:54:55 pm LnDDave: RT @jmass: A3. I wait for Dan Pink to popularize it #Lrnchat
08:55:00 pm mizminh: In How many languages should research be published? #lrnchat
08:55:11 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman then let go of your nose when you talk about them #lrnchat
08:55:36 pm JimLundy: @Quinnovator I’ll pile on. There is a lot of weak research out there. Many academics can’t operationalize their thoughts. #lrnchat
08:55:37 pm LnDDave: RT @usablelearning: @lrnchat a3) it IS frustrating, because some of the arch conventions of academic writing obscure meaning #Lrnchat
08:55:45 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q3: interpret data by looking for visual cues – diagrams, tables, pictures etc
08:55:51 pm urbie: #lrnchat sometimes news articles in the NY Times Sunday magazine get me started digging. a lot of general news is based on solid research..
08:55:55 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: How teachers learn to understand research http://t.co/z7lQFsfm #Lrnchat
08:55:57 pm Quinnovator: a3) riffing on @usablelearning, little reward in pubs for diagrams, examples, even clear data charts! (personal bugbear, grrr) #lrnchat
08:56:06 pm JaneBozarth: Best book in grad school was Miles & Huberman’s Qualitative Data Analysis (it ain’t all quantitative, btw. Lotsa probs w ‘data’) #lrnchat
08:56:21 pm JaneBozarth: @mizminh that’s a really good question. #lrnchat
08:56:38 pm atomic_lisa: RT @atomic_learning: Need help avoiding #plagiarism or citing research? http://t.co/0aDjU85h #engchat #lrnchat #ccchat #edtech #edchat
08:56:45 pm ThomasStone: Q3) Sometimes I rely on members of my network — who I trust in that domain — who can interpret, summarize it for me, to save time #lrnchat
08:56:48 pm urbie: #lrnchat A3 another way i get at research is based on the work i do.. necessity is a mother, right?
08:56:56 pm JaneBozarth: @Quinnovator true. journals want text, not pics #lrnchat
08:56:57 pm lodtrain: Q3) depends upon the research on how easy it is to read, or if you understand/almost expert in the subject you are reading about #lrnchat
08:57:08 pm Quinnovator: @JimLundy and you’re seeing the stuff that *is* published! (gripe). Pub *something* more important that pub something good #lrnchat
08:57:12 pm JD_Dillon: A3) Does this research come with pop-up pictures? :-) #lrnchat
08:57:18 pm JaneBozarth: Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat
08:57:24 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat a3) makes me so love these researchers who made a video to explain http://t.co/X8cWE6Rj #lrnchat #snakeinanfMRI
08:57:38 pm BenjaminHarwood: @mizminh As many as Google Translate can handle. #lrnchat
08:57:42 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat Doesn’t matter what lang it’s published in – academic DBs translate these days
08:57:43 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth I’m still not sure what’s wrong if some people are more tuned into research #lrnchat
08:57:47 pm JaneBozarth: mT @Quinnovator: stuff that *is* published! (gripe). Pub *something* more important that pub something good #lrnchat
08:57:49 pm cloud_counter: RT @JaneBozarth: Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat People who don’t like real ham? #sorry #pun #dadjoke
08:57:59 pm urbie: #lrnchat A3 the hardest part about reading academic research is getting through the APA citations in the text..
08:58:06 pm JaneBozarth: RT @usablelearning a3) makes me so love these researchers who made a video to explain http://t.co/OAFHBxE8 #snakeinanfMRI #lrnchat
08:58:30 pm AugmentedAdvert: RT: 20 Augmented Reality Experiments in #Education http://t.co/34g9HdKX #lrnchat #elearning: 20 Augmented Realit… http://t.co/GgvdX0Dp
08:58:35 pm Quinnovator: RT @cloud_counter: RT @JaneBozarth: Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat People who don’t like real ham? #sorry #pun #dadjoke
08:58:36 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman now that is so not what you said… #lrnchat
08:58:48 pm ThomasStone: Vikings in British restaurants? RT @JaneBozarth: Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat
08:59:10 pm xpconcept: @usablelearning @lrnchat – Yes, you’d think research types want more people to “get the message”, right? It’s a lot of work… #lrnchat
08:59:28 pm maryannville: Q1) I think research is for anyone. When I want to know something, I research it. #lrnchat
08:59:29 pm lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
08:59:30 pm JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood so in this case, validity of community vetting the research? #lrnchat
08:59:32 pm jmass: The only thing I’m on an expert of is my personal experience and even that is subject to debate. #lrnchat
08:59:37 pm usablelearning: I’ve often wondered that RT @JaneBozarth Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat
08:59:52 pm JaneBozarth: @ThomasStone or people w penchant for hashtags w fried eggs? #lrnchat
08:59:56 pm JaneBozarth: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
08:59:58 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
09:00:03 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
09:00:07 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth research has its own language. If you really want to understand it. Learn the language #lrnchat
09:00:07 pm JaneBozarth: @jmass lol #lrnchat
09:00:14 pm a_Tuffin: @JaneBozarth for market researchers to gage & track what is being presented to the public #lrnchat
09:00:20 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
09:00:20 pm LnDDave: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #Lrnchat
09:00:31 pm SecurEdgeNet: The Quintessential Principles of Digital Learning: Learn how to make sense of Digital Media http://t.co/sZhMEI1Z #edtech @elearning #lrnchat
09:00:31 pm urbie: #lrnchat A4 grad school taught that peer review is golden
09:00:36 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q4) What people or sources do you trust for research? #lrnchat
09:00:38 pm JoelleYalin: RT @JaneBozarth: How teachers learn to understand research http://t.co/oB0j3cgv #lrnchat
09:00:43 pm britz: MT @ThomasStone: Q3) Sometimes I rely on members of my network — who I trust in that domain — who can interpret, summarize #lrnchat
09:00:52 pm usablelearning: @xpconcept @lrnchat I think it’s partially cargo cults #lrnchat
09:00:54 pm BenjaminHarwood: @JaneBozarth I believe so. I can’t think of any other way for it be accepted as universal otherwise. #lrnchat
09:01:05 pm mpetersell: Q4 – sources that don’t have marketers attached to them! #lrnchat
09:01:11 pm lodtrain: Q4) Trusted sources Forester, Gartner, ASTD, and recognized industry experts #lrnchat
09:01:18 pm JD_Dillon: A4) The same people/sources I trust for professional feedback and mentorship. #lrnchat
09:01:25 pm usablelearning: @xpconcept @lrnchat and partially “I want to look smart like these other people/colleagues” #lrnchat
09:01:35 pm jmass: I prefer my neuroscience sensationalized if you’re taking requests. #lrnchat
09:01:37 pm lodtrain: RT @JD_Dillon: A4) The same people/sources I trust for professional feedback and mentorship. #lrnchat
09:01:47 pm urbie: #lrnchat A4 if i can get to it from one of the univ portals or http://t.co/3hxFmqFM then i’m cool with it
09:01:51 pm JimLundy: I used sign-off on over 300 research notes a year at Gartner. If it wasn’t tight, it got rejected. The same at @AragonResearch1 #lrnchat
09:01:53 pm mpetersell: RT @lodtrain: Q4) Trusted sources Forester, Gartner, ASTD, and recognized industry experts – good list! #lrnchat
09:01:56 pm JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood Reliability of Wikipedia http://t.co/kVUt9Vfo #lrnchat
09:02:00 pm Quinnovator: a4) 1. demonstrably sound research interpreters: Thalheimer, Bozarth, Clark, Rossett, Dirksen, etc #lrnchat
09:02:01 pm JaneBozarth: RT @jmass: I prefer my neuroscience sensationalized if youre taking requests. #lrnchat
09:02:08 pm JD_Dillon: A4) Research that allows open feedback and collaboration is more likely to get my vote of confidence. #lrnchat
09:02:23 pm LnDDave: A4) I trust people more than I trust organizations. #Lrnchat
09:02:26 pm JaneBozarth: RT @Quinnovator: a4) 1. demonstrably sound research interpreters: Thalheimer, Bozarth, Clark, Rossett, Dirksen, etc #lrnchat
09:02:31 pm lodtrain: RT @Quinnovator: a4) 1. demonstrably sound research interpreters: Thalheimer, Bozarth, Clark, Rossett, Dirksen, etc #lrnchat
09:02:37 pm JaneBozarth: @Quinnovator Quinn… #lrnchat
09:02:48 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat Q3) I also <3 researchers like @danariely who write research papers in a very readable style #lrnchat
09:02:56 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood Reliability of Wikipedia http://t.co/ul7zPsza #Lrnchat
09:03:04 pm LnDDave: RT @Quinnovator: a4) 1. demonstrably sound research interpreters: Thalheimer, Bozarth, Clark, Rossett, Dirksen, etc #Lrnchat
09:03:05 pm Quinnovator: a4) 2. demonstrably good/meaningful researchers: Mayer, Anderson, Collins, Van Merrienboer, Merrill, etc #lrnchat
09:03:07 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q4: SME’s – people love teaching what they know & are comfortable with!!
09:03:08 pm JaneBozarth: @reubentozman I did. #lrnchat
09:03:15 pm andrearist: RT @usablelearning: @lrnchat Q3) I also <3 researchers like @danariely who write research papers in a very readable style #lrnchat
09:03:33 pm JaneBozarth: @usablelearning yes and we need way more of that. And people willing to publish it. #lrnchat
09:03:33 pm BenjaminHarwood: @mpetersell @lodtrain Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #lrnchat
09:03:34 pm reubentozman: A4) I only trust the research itself, never the source. #lrnchat
09:03:51 pm LnDDave: A4) I trust ASTD and the eLearnjng Guild for industry research. #Lrnchat
09:03:56 pm britz: RT @jmass: The only thing I’m on an expert of is my personal experience and even that is subject to debate. #lrnchat /hear hear! :)
09:04:06 pm usablelearning: #backatcha @Quinnovator a4) 1. demonstrably sound research interpreters: Thalheimer, Bozarth, Clark, Rossett, Dirksen, etc #lrnchat
09:04:55 pm JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood GREAT question RT Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #lrnchat
09:05:01 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q4: @tederick – great research in Mobile app/gaming for learners
09:05:13 pm Quinnovator: a4) 2a. Sweller, Koedinger, Chi, Van Lehn, JSB, Herrington, Reeves, list goes on #lrnchat
09:05:27 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood GREAT question RT Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #Lrnchat
09:05:29 pm reubentozman: @JaneBozarth I wasn’t saying you personally. My point being is nothing wrong with research written for those who understand #lrnchat
09:05:40 pm usablelearning: @JaneBozarth @jmass I already tweeted the snakes in an fMRI – that topped me out for sensational #lrnchat
09:05:44 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q4: OEM’s as they know their products best!
09:05:47 pm JaneBozarth: Q4 Mayer. #lrnchat
09:05:51 pm maryannville: Q2) I rely on peer review sites a lot. I want to know what other people experienced so I have an idea of what to expect #lrnchat
09:06:00 pm urbie: #lrnchat A4 the thing with industry experts is how transparent are they? do they own up to advertisers, etc?
09:06:11 pm Quinnovator: RT @BenjaminHarwood: @mpetersell @lodtrain Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #lrnchat < not who, what: integrity
09:06:48 pm mpetersell: RT @maryannville: Q2) … peer review sites … I want to know what other people experienced so I have an idea of what to expect #lrnchat
09:07:10 pm lodtrain: @BenjaminHarwood @mpetersell #lrnchat Hopefully us! and their own passion for providing good information
09:07:12 pm jmass: An important question to ask, who’s funding the research? #lrnchat
09:07:23 pm JaneBozarth: Probs w peer-reviewed research http://t.co/yo9eYvAY #lrnchat
09:07:33 pm JaneBozarth: RT @jmass: An important question to ask, whos funding the research? #lrnchat
09:07:35 pm lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:07:58 pm BenjaminHarwood: RT @Quinnovator: RT @BenjaminHarwood: @mpetersell @lodtrain Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #lrnchat < not who, what: integrity
09:08:00 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:08:06 pm lodtrain: “@mpetersell: RT @maryannville: Q2) … peer review sites … I want to know what other people experienced … #lrnchat” ditto
09:08:08 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:08:16 pm maryannville: I love #Yelp and #Amazon reviews for products and I tend to #Google everything :) #lrnchat
09:08:21 pm mpetersell: Q5 – they find me! #lrnchat
09:08:27 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:08:37 pm usablelearning: @reubentozman @JaneBozarth Guideline: summaries are ok to get familiar, but if you are going to base action on it, read the source? #lrnchat
09:08:39 pm Quinnovator: @urbie great point, transparency critical to integrity for interpreters.Thinking ‘out loud’ or is their stuff proprietary? #lrnchat
09:08:45 pm JaneBozarth: @jmass People accepted for years early study that breakfast was critical w/o asking who funded the study: Post cereal. #lrnchat
09:08:46 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:08:47 pm JD_Dillon: A5) Follow sources that make information readily available (social, industry publications, events) #lrnchat
09:09:12 pm lodtrain: Q5) I subscribe to many, colleagues tell me, social communities and my own research on research studies #lrnchat
09:09:19 pm Quinnovator: a5) the google and twitter #lrnchat
09:09:25 pm usablelearning: Yep RT @JaneBozarth RT @jmass: An important question to ask, whos funding the research? #lrnchat
09:09:28 pm urbie: #lrnchat A5 Capella’s library is tops. UNT’s too. My research studies start there or at ERIC. sometimes articles i hear about via SoMe..
09:09:29 pm JaneBozarth: @maryannville I agree: if 400 people review a game, 380 of them are 5-star, I tend to give it credence. See: Ticket To Ride #lrnchat
09:09:31 pm reubentozman: Q5) these days I use MaRS in Toronto. Back in the day I used ERIC #lrnchat
09:09:37 pm jmass: I drive a LexisNexis. #nerdjokes #lrnchat
09:10:13 pm KirkBoller: A4 #lrnchat We established our own R&D. It has been a huge success & has moved us forward more than expected.
09:10:13 pm lodtrain: “@Quinnovator: a5) the google and twitter #lrnchat” and linkedin, yammer, expert blogs #lrnchat
09:10:30 pm reubentozman: @usablelearning YES #lrnchat
09:10:34 pm JaneBozarth: This is really all about LinkedIn Answers going away, isn’t it? #lrnchat
09:10:36 pm Quinnovator: RT @lodtrain: “@Quinnovator: a5) the google and twitter #lrnchat” and linkedin, yammer, expert blogs #lrnchat < those too!
09:10:38 pm billcush: RT @lrnchat: Q5) How do you find research studies? #lrnchat
09:10:38 pm JaneBozarth: RT @jmass: I drive a LexisNexis. #nerdjokes #lrnchat
09:10:50 pm Quinnovator: a5) my colleagues! #lrnchat
09:10:55 pm JaneBozarth: I often start w Google Scholar #lrnchat
09:11:21 pm JaneBozarth: Often track bibliog/lit review items from one article to another #lrnchat
09:11:23 pm LnDDave: RT @Quinnovator: a5) my colleagues! #Lrnchat
09:11:26 pm billcush: Q5) http://t.co/EOgajkqx is quite good. #lrnchat
09:11:42 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q5: through post graduate society updates
09:12:09 pm billcush: Agreed! RT @urbie: #lrnchat A5 Capella’s library is tops…. My research studies start there or at ERIC…
09:12:13 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat Important research skill is identifying key search terms and using advanced search tool
09:12:24 pm reubentozman: A5) universities offer unique resources to academic journals. #lrnchat
09:12:59 pm Quinnovator: @urbie @lodtrain the LinkedIn discussions occasionally surface real value, but you do have to have a good ‘motivation’ filter ;) #lrnchat
09:13:03 pm jmass: I wait for the Sunday @NYTimes to tell me how to think. That means during the week I’m not thinking. #lrnchat
09:13:10 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat q5) seems an opportune time for a #PDFTribute shoutout #aaronswartz #openaccess #lrnchat
09:13:52 pm billcush: Very cool! RT @KirkBoller: A4 #lrnchat We established our own R&D. It has been a huge success & has moved us forward more than expected.
09:14:10 pm JaneBozarth: @jmass ha #lrnchat
09:14:10 pm Quinnovator: RT @billcush: Very cool! RT @KirkBoller: A4 #lrnchat We established our own R&D. It has been a huge success & has moved us forward more than expected.
09:14:31 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q5: industry specialists & OEM’s.
09:14:47 pm urbie: #lrnchat A5 oh yeah.. one other AWESOME source for research are #mooc like #etmooc and others .. amazing collaborative research opps..
09:15:04 pm maryannville: RT @LnDDave: A4) I trust ASTD and the eLearnjng Guild for industry research. #Lrnchat
09:15:09 pm lodtrain: “@Quinnovator: @urbie @lodtrain the LinkedIn discussions with groups, and my contacts lead me to great sources of research #lrnchat
09:15:19 pm AlisonSeaman: MT @britz: @ThomasStone: Sometimes I rely on members of my netwrk—who I trust in domain of knowldg to interpret/summarize #lrnchat #etmooc
09:15:27 pm lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:15:38 pm Quinnovator: @KirkBoller though read (Keith Sawyer?) say separating makes it difficult to transition to operations (e.g. Xerox PARC) #lrnchat
09:15:44 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:15:52 pm JaneBozarth: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:15:55 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:15:55 pm jmass: I’m taking a really cool asynchronous MOOC, you can too, here’s the URL http://t.co/2MacEgDE #lrnchat
09:16:04 pm tomspiglanin: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:16:05 pm maryannville: @LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: @BenjaminHarwood GREAT question RT Who motivates industry experts to be trustworthy? #Lrnchat
09:16:11 pm billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. 4 out of 5 dentists agree. #lrnchat
09:16:14 pm LnDDave: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #Lrnchat
09:16:31 pm urbie: #lrnchat A6 being a practitioner vs a researcher it’s easy to eval research cred: i apply it in my projects n see what sticks
09:16:35 pm billcush: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:16:38 pm JaneBozarth: RT @billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. 4 out of 5 dentists agree. #lrnchat
09:16:41 pm jmass: RT @LnDDave: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #Lrnchat
09:16:41 pm cammybean: q6) I evaluate the value and credibility of research by asking @janebozarth #lrnchat
09:16:46 pm JaneBozarth: q6 my bigger interest is why people dismiss piles of evidence? http://t.co/TWqxe4Ue #lrnchat
09:16:52 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat Evaluate research by understanding methods and learning how to critically evaluate. It’s a learned skill.
09:16:52 pm joelyoh: Good to know! RT @jmass: I wait for the Sunday @NYTimes to tell me how to think. That means during the week I’m not thinking. #lrnchat
09:16:53 pm reubentozman: A6) I start with the researchers assumptions inherent in the research #lrnchat
09:16:58 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:17:03 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #lrnchat
09:17:06 pm urbie: #lrnchat A6 some others like @laurapasquini are right-on with the stuff they tweet i know it’s golden
09:17:11 pm JaneBozarth: @cammybean smart cookie, you. #lrnchat
09:17:15 pm JaneBozarth: RT @cammybean: q6) I evaluate the value and credibility of research by asking @janebozarth #lrnchat
09:17:31 pm JD_Dillon: A6) Discussion with trusted peers in my network #lrnchat
09:17:50 pm Quinnovator: a6) synthesis (that sets up study value), quality of citations (know their stuff?) & methodology (good design). #lrnchat
09:18:09 pm tomspiglanin: A6) history of credibility of researchers, transparency of method, involvement of many. #lrnchat
09:18:11 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat Surveys etc can be good research. Important thing is to disclose # who participated and other info so others can evaluate
09:18:12 pm JD_Dillon: RT @Quinnovator: a6) synthesis (that sets up study value), quality of citations (know their stuff?) & methodology (good design). #lrnchat
09:18:24 pm cammybean: @janebozarth Yeah, why do people not trust research? Did we talk about this already? #lrnchat
09:18:33 pm LnDDave: A6) Peer review #Lrnchat
09:18:36 pm cammybean: RT @JaneBozarth: q6 my bigger interest is why people dismiss piles of evidence? http://t.co/3wWprTVh #lrnchat
09:18:43 pm lodtrain: Q6) Research value = expert review/peer review approval and good sample (not 20 people but thousands…) #lrnchat
09:18:54 pm tomspiglanin: A6) eLearning Guild report by Clark Quinn @Quinnovator – tend to trust
#lrnchat
09:18:57 pm billcush: Q6) if the research process is well explained, the process is followed, and acknowledges +/-‘s of its reliability..it prob good #lrnchat
09:19:02 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat Gotta run #lrnchat, but lemme know if anybody fixes the academic publishing economic model after I go #Night!
09:19:07 pm JaneBozarth: @stickytraining yes. key learning point in my own research was IRB explaining that ‘anonymous’ & ‘confidential’ are different #lrnchat
09:19:07 pm maryannville: A6) If I think a person or organization has credibility and value, then I’ll trust their research #lrnchat
09:19:19 pm cammybean: @LnDDave You gotta trust your peers then :) #lrnchat
09:19:39 pm urbie: #lrnchat A6 if i learned about the research from TV (Dr. Oz) then right away it’s suspect..
09:19:54 pm JaneBozarth: @cammybean No we didn’t . Why do people dismiss research? Cog bias, I suppose. #LoveLearningStyles #LoveMBTI #LoveDigitalNatives #lrnchat
09:20:04 pm audioswhite: “@Digitaltonto: The Power of Synthesis and the Problem with Experts http://t.co/WkvmNfGp” #lrnchat
09:20:21 pm Quinnovator: RT @JaneBozarth: q6 my bigger interest is why people dismiss piles of evidence? http://t.co/TWqxe4Ue #lrnchat
09:20:24 pm JaneBozarth: @cammybean yes — what if you don’t trust your ‘peers’? #lrnchat
09:20:25 pm lodtrain: “@cammybean: @janebozarth Yeah, why do people not trust research? #lrnchat” maybe due to creative statistics/charts portrayed a certain way
09:20:44 pm jmass: I prefer peer-reviewed literature by a publishing house called TMZ. | I hope my humor is welcome tonight, in a mood I guess. #lrnchat
09:20:49 pm reubentozman: A6) do interpretation of results flow from the data? Is there research bias? Do assumptions discredit results? #lrnchat
09:20:53 pm britz: RT @billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. 4 out of 5 dentists agree. #lrnchat / crapsourced
09:21:24 pm JD_Dillon: A6) Will I stake my reputation on this information (and it’s creators) once I have applied it? #lrnchat
09:21:37 pm lodtrain: RT @JD_Dillon: A6) Will I stake my reputation on this information (and it’s creators) once I have applied it? #lrnchat
09:21:38 pm LnDDave: RT @JaneBozarth: @cammybean yes — what if you dont trust your peers? << well, that’s a prerequisite. #Lrnchat
09:21:39 pm Quinnovator: a6) why do people ignore research redux: http://t.co/Il9nYKON #lrnchat
09:21:40 pm billcush: Q6) I know he gets on base 43% of the time, but he doesn’t look like a ball player. – scout to Billy Beane. #lrnchat
09:21:41 pm jmass: Mad lolz “@britz: RT @billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. 4 out of 5 dentists agree. #lrnchat / crapsourced”
09:21:43 pm ActivateLearn: @LearnKotch @LnDDave @lrnchat @ryantracey Oh crap, did I miss #lrnchat? Oops.
09:22:03 pm JaneBozarth: @jmass I’m making fun of learning styles, MBTI, and, well, other things. So let’s have a good time… #lrnchat
09:22:08 pm Quinnovator: RT @tomspiglanin: A6) eLearning Guild report by Clark Quinn @Quinnovator – tend to trust #lrnchat < thanks!
09:22:15 pm mpetersell: Don’t you love the USA Today infographics while having coffee at the hotel breakfast buffet? #lrnchat
09:22:20 pm stickytraining: @janebozarth Yes confidentiality is big with IRB. And data can be contaminated – bad – if confidentiality is broken. #lrnchat
09:22:21 pm JaneBozarth: @ActivateLearn You did. Should we start over? #lrnchat
09:22:34 pm lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:22:37 pm usablelearning: @lrnchat Remember not to use your “There’s research that says…”-Superpower for evil. People *will* believe you #lrnchat #citeresponsibly
09:22:46 pm maryannville: Every little bit helps! “@billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. 4 out of 5 dentists agree. #lrnchat”
09:22:48 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:22:49 pm jmass: I find really interesting shit and tell people about it and then they tell me about it, three years later. #lrnchat
09:22:58 pm urbie: #lrnchat A6 it’s like doing HFDF in the Navy back in the day: the more peers that cite/mention the research the more i trust it..
09:23:01 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:23:03 pm billcush: 4 out of 5 lrnchatters agree. RT @jmass: I prefer peer-reviewed literature by a publishing house called TMZ..in a mood I guess. #lrnchat
09:23:13 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:23:14 pm JD_Dillon: RT @lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:23:33 pm maryannville: RT @lrnchat: Q6) How do you evaluate the value and credibility of research? #Lrnchat
09:23:37 pm Quinnovator: a7) read, interpret in terms of how I want the world to be, and then recycle #lrnchat ;)
09:23:49 pm cammybean: q7) I share results of what i’ve read with clients all the time to educate (although I can never remember where I read anything!) #lrnchat
09:24:01 pm eianuzi: RT @usablelearning: I’ve often wondered that RT @JaneBozarth Bigger question tonight: Who is spam for? #lrnchat
09:24:02 pm billcush: RT @lrnchat: Q7) What do you actually do with research studies you have read? Can you share examples? #lrnchat
09:24:04 pm JD_Dillon: A7) Use as validation for design decisions with peers and clients, discuss with my group for shared development … #lrnchat
09:24:08 pm cammybean: RT @jmass: I find really interesting shit and tell people about it and then they tell me about it, three years later. #lrnchat
09:24:22 pm xpconcept: #lrnchat – A6) a little skepticism is healthy. Looking for what could be right / wrong is part of filtering research.
09:24:26 pm maryannville: Time to find new peers… “@JaneBozarth: @cammybean yes — what if you don’t trust your ‘peers’? #lrnchat”
09:24:44 pm Quinnovator: a7) (seriously) continue to add to my models of what works and proselytize the, er, heck out of good design #lrnchat
09:24:49 pm mpetersell: RT @Quinnovator: a7) read, interpret in terms of how I want the world to be, and then recycle #lrnchat ;) – double :)
#lrnchat
09:25:01 pm Quinnovator: RT @xpconcept: #lrnchat – A6) a little skepticism is healthy. Looking for what could be right / wrong is part of filtering research. < yay!
09:25:08 pm urbie: #lrnchat I curate links to best research (and other stuff) i find with the pearltree Tools: check it out here http://t.co/kzUoQDh4
09:25:28 pm JaneBozarth: @mpetersell Try to incorp into practice. IE, Sweller et al cognitive load, Mayer et al on multimedia ID #lrnchat
09:25:44 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q7: best practices for creation & adoption of mobile learning with @Quinnovator #amazing
09:25:46 pm JaneBozarth: FYI @cammybean is peerless. #lrnchat
09:25:50 pm Quinnovator: RT @jmass: I find really interesting shit and tell people about it and then they tell me about it, 3 years later. #lrnchat < me: 10
09:25:57 pm billcush: Q7) I implemented social performance mgmt partly because of some research I read on feedback. #lrnchat
09:25:58 pm maryannville: RT @JD_Dillon: A7) Use as validation for design decisions with peers and clients, discuss with my group for shared development … #lrnchat
09:26:12 pm reubentozman: A7) use it for elitist purposes. all part of Zionist conspiracy #lrnchat
09:26:15 pm mizminh: Is the science sound? Has Popperian falsifiability informed the design and interpretation. Research is about science not opinions.#lrnchat
09:26:43 pm jmass: Have they invented a prosthesis for the brain yet? #lrnchat
09:26:46 pm cammybean: @JaneBozarth Ha! #lrnchat
09:26:48 pm stickytraining: @CammyBean ditto, but people do seem to like to hear a few details about the research studies, I’ve found. #lrnchat
09:27:25 pm JD_Dillon: @reubentozman I wish I had made “zionist” the Pee-Wee Herman style word of the day for #lrnchat
09:27:26 pm lrnchat: QWrap) It’s that time again. Please re-introduce yourself. (Shameless plugs welcome.) #lrnchat
09:27:35 pm Quinnovator: RT @lrnchat: QWrap) It’s that time again. Please re-introduce yourself. (Shameless plugs welcome.) #lrnchat < already?
09:27:42 pm britz: Q7 seek out practical applications, assess against my orgs needs, extract best principles, and try ‘em #lrnchat
09:27:49 pm maryannville: I can share :) “@JaneBozarth: FYI @cammybean is peerless. #lrnchat”
09:27:50 pm JaneBozarth: I like to throw it out and watch people ignore it while they scramble to order more personality style instruments. You? #lrnchat
09:28:02 pm cammybean: @stickytraining Yeah, I need a better brain to help me with that :)
#lrnchat
09:28:05 pm JaneBozarth: RT @lrnchat: QWrap) Its that time again. Please re-introduce yourself. (Shameless plugs welcome.) #lrnchat
09:28:07 pm mpetersell: RT @lrnchat: QWrap) Its that time again. Please re-introduce yourself. (Shameless plugs welcome.) #lrnchat
09:28:09 pm Quinnovator: thanks to new and returning #lrnchat participants for another wild and wise session!
09:28:11 pm lodtrain: THANKS FOR ANOTHER GREAT CHAT!!! #lrnchat
09:28:19 pm billcush: Crapsourced! Yes!I prefer RT @jmass: Mad lolz “@britz: RT @billcush: Q5) I just do a poll on FB and call it research. #lrnchat / crapsourced
09:28:21 pm ActivateLearn: @JaneBozarth Doh! Momentarily distracted with prawn dumplings for lunch. No dumplings for me next week @ryantracey @LearnKotch #lrnchat
09:28:59 pm lodtrain: IT global education “clickity click” training #lrnchat
09:29:03 pm JD_Dillon: QWrap) JD from Orlando, FL. Check out L&D Global Events (http://t.co/L6bfQ9nX). Hope to see you at LS 2013 in March. Thanks! #lrnchat
09:29:07 pm JaneBozarth: HEY! Who’s at ASTD TK in San Jose next week? I’m there Sun-Wednesday. #lrnchat
09:29:10 pm stickytraining: @lrnchat Hi all. I’m Barbara Carnes, trng consultant, specialize in training transfer research, teach in grad programs on the side.#lrnchat
09:29:13 pm Quinnovator: aWrap) Clark Quinn, ex-academic, theory buff, learning experience design instigator, genial malcontent, consultant/speaker/author #lrnchat
09:29:13 pm billcush: TV. RT @jmass: Have they invented a prosthesis for the brain yet? #lrnchat
09:29:21 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Q7: reading & listening to real life examples through webinars by @JaneBozarth. Research put into practice in my own role
09:29:38 pm mpetersell: It has been fun. Mike from Connecticut saying good night! 4 out of 5 learning peeps prefer #lrnchat
09:29:48 pm jmass: Hosting a “Customer Love” event in NYC, pizza & beer, third Thursday of every month at #Adobe NYC. RSVP by tweet. Please RT. #lrnchat
09:29:56 pm JaneBozarth: @a_Tuffin your check’s in the mail . thank you! #lrnchat
09:30:03 pm urbie: #lrnchat A7 i apply the research when i can. like in a course i’m doing now: http://t.co/SlXFU5zX .. getting my trainees mobile for efficacy
09:30:10 pm reubentozman: Wrap) Reuben Tozman. Retired from L&D. Will see many of you in the weeks to come #lrnchat
09:30:23 pm urbie: RT @lrnchat: QWrap) It’s that time again. Please re-introduce yourself. (Shameless plugs welcome.) #lrnchat
09:30:24 pm Interactyx: Podcast: Status of #eLearning http://t.co/T8yNKG60 #lrnchat
09:30:31 pm Quinnovator: hope to see you at TK13 (next week!), or Learning Solutions, or… #lrnchat
09:30:35 pm JaneBozarth: I’m doing the new ASTD Social Media for Learning certificate as precon at TK, ICE, more. Check it out. #lrnchat
09:30:44 pm lrnchat: Goodnight everyone, and thanks for another great #lrnchat. See you next week at this same time!
09:31:00 pm maryannville: My first #lrnchat was fun! Thanks everyone for sharing! -Mary Ann :)
09:31:01 pm JaneBozarth: Also coming in October: 2nd Edition of “Better than Bullet Points”. #lrnchat
09:31:18 pm urbie: #lrnchat Qwrap urbie delgado, instructional designer, rehumanizing training.. if then maybe dot com for more
09:31:23 pm a_Tuffin: @JaneBozarth #lrnchat happy to support your amazing work :)
09:31:33 pm JaneBozarth: @maryannville oh good. you did well. Sometimes we scare people. #lrnchat
09:31:50 pm billcush: Qwrap) Bill Cushard in Colorado. Aspiring social scientist in HPT and author. Ciao all! #lrnchat
09:32:23 pm jmass: Sometimes I favorite a tweet because I’m greedy and I don’t want to share. #lrnchat
09:32:23 pm JaneBozarth: @a_Tuffin I have something new and cool coming in late spring. you’re going to love it. May be my new Big Thing. #lrnchat
09:32:49 pm a_Tuffin: @lrnchat #lrnchat Autumn T. Elearning addict, half of my answers were my roommates, he’s brilliant, adult ed sponge, SoMe addict. :) thanks!
09:33:27 pm stickytraining: #lrnchat I’ll be at TK too – session Making Elearning Stick
ICE Making Compliance Training Stick
09:33:52 pm JaneBozarth: @a_Tuffin @lrnchat ah. and here we thought you just had 2 brains. #lrnchat
09:34:05 pm a_Tuffin: @JaneBozarth #lrnchat I will 100% keep my ear to the ground! Really looking forward to that! Thank you!!
09:34:54 pm a_Tuffin: @JaneBozarth @lrnchat #lrnchat bringing insight from 2 different industries in Re: to learning! Best of both worlds!
09:37:11 pm a_Tuffin: Cannot even begin to explain how much I loved #lrnchat tonight! Such an amazing experience every week! Thanks everyone! @lrnchat

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 8,591 other followers

%d bloggers like this: